📅 Aug 18, 2017 FROM EPSTEIN

Fwd:

From: jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>

To: Jeffrey Epstein

Forwarded messag= From: jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.co= <mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com» Date: Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 9:58 AM Subject: Fwd: =o: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacatio=@gmail.com <mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com> > Forwarded message From: jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com <mailto:jeevacation@=mail.com» Date: =ed, Apr 15, 2015 at 8:59 AM Subject: To: Melanie Spinella 1 did the paul weiss bill get pa=d ??? 2. Talk to me before signing anything today import=nt 10m paid today to gratitude am

Forwarded messag=

From: jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.co= <mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com» Date: Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 9:58 AM

Subject: Fwd:

=o: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacatio=@gmail.com <mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com> >

Forwarded message

From: jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com <mailto:jeevacation@=mail.com»

Date: =ed, Apr 15, 2015 at 8:59 AM
Subject:

To: Melanie Spinella

1 did the paul weiss bill get pa=d ??? 2. Talk to me before signing anything today import=nt

10m paid today to gratitude america, a 5=1 c 3, willl make last year complete. 20 million paid to=ay ftc . 10 million july 15 5 million sept 30. , 5 million jan=1 for all of 16 . tax savings paid at 37 percent . =of net. savings. 50 million credit. net. so 150 million =ree . 600 savings 225 million owed. - 50 credit, 1=5 owed.

=C2 please note

The informat=on contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-cli=nt privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only =or the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthoriz=d use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof =s strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this

return e-mail o= by e-mail to j=evacation@gmail.com <mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com> , and destroy this communication and all copies =hereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved <Aiv>

📅 Aug 18, 2017

FYI

From: Edward Epstein

To: Jeff Epstein

Hi Jeff I thought this might interest you A Question of Motive Russia wasn't trying to elect a particular candidate: Vladimir Putin wanted to delegitimize our elections, above all. Edward Jay Epstein July 31, 2017 Politics and law The 2016 presidential campaign was marked by three disclosure operations, all of which appear to have had a single author. "Oppo research" is the euphemism commonly used in elections for such operations. The mechanism is fairly simple: dirt is obtained from whereve

Hi Jeff

I thought this might interest you

A Question of Motive

Russia wasn't trying to elect a particular candidate: Vladimir Putin wanted to delegitimize our elections, above all. Edward Jay Epstein July 31, 2017 Politics and law

The 2016 presidential campaign was marked by three disclosure operations, all of which appear to have had a single author. "Oppo research" is the euphemism commonly used in elections for such operations. The mechanism is fairly simple: dirt is obtained from wherever it can be found to discredit an opponent. It is then "leaked," usually either anonymously or on background, to targeted media channels. What makes the 2016 campaign particularly interesting from a counterintelligence perspective is not that both sides had their own disclosure operations, but that both sides were offered the dirt for them by a common source: Russian intelligence.

As we now know from the emails of Donald Trump Jr., a thinly veiled intermediary, Natalya Veselnitskaya, offered the Trump campaign documents that putatively would show that Hillary Clinton had received illegal donations from Russian financiers; in the event, no such documents were proffered. But it is a reasonable assumption that Veselnitskaya could not have made such an offer, especially in a meeting attended by three other Russians, unless the move was approved by the FSB, the Russian security service.

A second disclosure operation, this one involving supporters of the Clinton campaign, was more layered. The proximate intermediary was Fusion GPS, a research firm used by the law firm Baker Hostetler, and the secondary "cut-out" was the British firm Orbis, co-founded by former MI-6 officer Christopher Steele. We know something about this sub-contractor from the depositions Steele gave in defending a libel suit in London. According to Steele, Fusion GPS not only had him prepare the so-called "dossier" on Trump but also directed Steele to "leak" it to specified reporters at Mother Jones, Yahoo, the New York Times, the Washington Post, The New Yorker, and CNN. In some cases, Steele was directed to brief the selected journalists personally. The dirt in these leaks relied heavily on information supplied by two Russian government sources: Source A, whom Steele calls "a senior Russian Foreign Ministry figure"; and Source B, "a former top-level intelligence officer still active in the Kremlin." Sources A and B provided information supposedly exposing a long-time Russian FSB operation to get compromising information that could be used to control Trump. The idea that two Russian intelligence sources would reveal a long-time Kremlin-backed FSB operation bears further examination. Michael Morell, a former acting CIA director, casts light on the sourcing of the dirt in the Steele dossier. "I had two questions when I first read [the dossier]," Morell said in an NBC interview. "One was, how did Chris [Steele] talk to these sources? I have subsequently learned that he used intermediaries. I asked myself, why did these guys provide this information, what was their motivation? And I subsequently learned that he paid them. That the intermediaries paid the sources and the intermediaries got the money from Chris."

Paying ex-FSB officers for sensitive information? As Steele is no doubt aware, there is no such thing as an ex-FSB officer. All Russian intelligence officers, whether currently or formerly employed, if in Russia, operate under the same tough security regime. The selling of secret information by them is espionage, pure and simple. Selling it to someone connected to an adversary intelligence service greatly compounds the crime. Sources A and B (through their intermediaries) knew that they were dealing with an ex-MI-6 man who could use their betrayal of secrets against them. The only safe way for A and B to provide the requested dirt would be to clear it with the security regime at the FSB. This precaution, a required step in such exchanges, would mean that the dirt in the dossier, whether true or false, was curated by the FSB and spoon-fed to Steele. If so, the FSB was the surreptitious provider of this part of the Steele dossier.

The third disclosure operation involved stolen emails from the DNC bearing on the unfair treatment by Democratic Party officials of Bernie Sanders, which were posted on the DC Leaks website. President Obama identified the Kremlin as the author of this operation, saying "These data theft and disclosure activities could only have been directed by the highest oppo-research levels of the operatives, Russian government." Because of their singular focus on getting usable slime, the FSB would have curated the dirt. To be sure, but why would Russia so blatantly feed the slime to all sides in a campaign?

The United States has a wide array of tools for monitoring Russian intelligence, including the world's most sophisticated sensors for intercepting signals, but discovering the Kremlin's motives remains an elusive enterprise because, unlike in a scientific inquiry, one cannot fully trust the observable data. While a scientist can safely assume that the microbes he observes through the lens of a microscope are not employing guile to mislead him, an intelligence analyst cannot make similar assumptions about the content of intercepted communications from Russia. If one assumes that the Russians do not know that the channel is being monitored—an assumption which, following the defection of Edward Snowden to Russia, is hard to make prudently—then the intelligence gleaned from that channel can reveal the Kremlin's activities and motive. If, however, it is understood that the Russians know that a channel is being monitored, the information conveyed over it can be considered a disclosure operation.

If, for example, a Mafia family finds out that the FBI is tapping its telephone lines, it can use those lines to burn its rivals. The Kremlin can also use a known tapped phone line to its advantage. Consider, for example, the tapped phone of Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak. On December 1, 2016, Kislyak went to Trump Tower to meet Jared Kushner and Michael Flynn. According to Kushner's version of that meeting, Kislyak suggested that Russian generals could supply information about Russian military operations in Syria on the condition that the Trump transition team provide a "secure line in the transition office." Of course, as Kislyak likely knew, transition teams don't have secure lines to Moscow. Kushner responded by asking if the Russian embassy could supply such a "secure line." Kislyak then used an open phone line at his embassy to relay Kushner's response to his foreign ministry in Moscow. It is inconceivable that Kislyak did not know that the call would be monitored by the FBI, since the FBI had routinely listened in on these lines for the past 68 years, or that his discussion of Kushner's request would set off alarm bells in the intelligence community.

If Kislyak had wanted to hide this exchange from U.S. intelligence, he could have easily sent it under diplomatic cover directly to Moscow, used a secure line, or relayed it in a coded fashion. By communicating the message en clair, or in plaintext, Kislyak skillfully exposed Kushner's incredibly stupid response, which he himself had provoked, to stoke distrust about the incoming president within the U.S. intelligence community. Nor was this the only distrust Kislyak cultivated: the conversations on the monitored phone led to the firing of National Security Advisor Michael Flynn, and conversations that Kislyak had with Attorney General Jeff Sessions led to Sessions's recusing himself from the Russian investigation, which has now driven a wedge between President Trump and one of his most effective and popular cabinet members.

Kislyak's resume indicates that he is a well-regarded and competent player in the game of nations: he has served as Second Secretary of the Soviet UN mission in New York, First Secretary of the Soviet Embassy in Washington, Deputy Director of the Soviet Department of International Organizations in Moscow, Permanent Russian representative to NATO in Brussels, Deputy Foreign Minister, and Ambassador to the United States. Nothing in his 37-year career, either during or after the Cold War, suggests that his moves are not aligned with Kremlin strategy.

But when it comes to the various disclosures and interventions surrounding the 2016 election, what exactly was that strategy?

In a report issued on January 6, 2017, entitled "Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent U.S. Elections," the U.S. intelligence community concluded, based both on its sources and its analysis of stories on the Russian-controlled network RT, that Putin wanted to hurt Clinton, help Trump, and discredit the American election. These may well have been motives of the Russian president, but the narrowly focused assessment fails to explain, or even take into account, Kislyak's post-election ensnarement of Kushner, or the discrediting dirt against Trump. If Putin had really wanted to help Trump win the election, why did Russian sources provide damaging dirt to Steele, which could have cost Trump the election? Why did Kislyak provide the FBI with information, via a known tapped line, that could (and did) compromise key members of Trump's administration?

A wider focus can be found, of all places, in Oliver Stone's revealing, if fawning, four-hour interview with Putin, in which the Russian dictator makes clear that he views American hegemony, including America's standing and respect in the international community, as a threat that Russia must counter. One way to undermine America's standing is to provide disclosures that can be used by its own political factions, and the media, to sow distrust in America's reliability as a democracy founded on transparency. Putin tells the truth when he says that it doesn't matter particularly to Russia whether Clinton or Trump won the election: his goal was to install doubt in the legitimacy of the process, regardless of how it turned out.

Edward Jay Epstein's most recent book is How America Lost Its Secrets: Edward Snowden, the Man and the Theft, published by Alfred A. Knopf in January.

📅 Apr 22, 2015 FROM EPSTEIN

another flowery email.

From: jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>

To: Melanie Spinell

I am sorry. I realize you are under tremendous stress, In Bedford you asked me for my help I could not have been more clear that thought it very unwise as in my words I did not want any financial arrangement between us, it risked conflict and tension what neither of us needed more of. and did not want to risk torturing our friendship into the likes of the kind you have with Mark nor Josh, : now,- I dont have anyone but you yelling at me , in my own house. no one. it is highly unpleasant but I am

I am sorry. I realize you are under tremendous stress, In Bedford you asked me for my help I could not have been more clear that thought it very unwise as in my words I did not want any financial arrangement between us, it risked conflict and tension what neither of us needed more of. and did not want to risk torturing our friendship into the likes of the kind you have with Mark nor Josh, : now,- I dont have anyone but you yelling at me , in my own house. no one. it is highly unpleasant but I am trying my best to be understanding . sorry . From the outset and as you told me you rec. i suggested that three years should be the period of engagement. as planning is not a one year exercise . you declined to commit to a number of alternatives presented to you for payment of the third year. I told you in nov that you should decide whether to now sign on for that very third year as the vast majority of my work ended on oct 15. you recently told me you thought i was kidding. .you hired brad patting him on the back that after months of inquiry he can now, finally tell you which Ilc owns the cars??

once he has all the facts what next ??. whether or not you refer to a portion of the third year as after care, or whatever term besides 'scoundrel you choose to use, I m not sure why you assume now it should be free.( I HATE THIS CONVERSATION < HATE , ) and i heard you when you said you told me what was I work still to be done you thought valuable enough to pay for. please tell me . and then we can decide the next steps „, if any. I consider my work rarefied art. I guess the value is in the eye of the beholder . IT reminds me of those people looking at a modern art piece and saying " my child could do that " . hope you are feeling better.

📅 Aug 19, 2017 FROM EPSTEIN

Fwd: another flowery email.

From: jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>

To: Jeffrey Epstein

Forwarded message From: jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> Date: Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 7:56 AM Subject: another flowery email. To: Melanie Spinell I am sorry. I realize you are under tremendous stress, In Bedford you asked me for my help I could not have been more clear that thought it very unwise as in my words I did not want any financial arrangement between us, it risked conflict and tension what neither of us needed more of. and did not want to risk torturing our friendship into the likes of

Forwarded message
From: jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 7:56 AM
Subject: another flowery email.
To: Melanie Spinell

I am sorry. I realize you are under tremendous stress, In Bedford you asked me for my help I could not have been more clear that thought it very unwise as in my words I did not want any financial arrangement between us, it risked conflict and tension what neither of us needed more of. and did not want to risk torturing our friendship into the likes of the kind you have with Mark nor Josh, : now,- I dont have anyone but you yelling at me , in my own house. no one. it is highly unpleasant but I am trying my best to be understanding . sorry . From the outset and as you told me you rec. i suggested that three years should be the period of engagement. as planning is not a one year exercise . you declined to commit to a number of alternatives presented to you for payment of the third year. I told you in nov that you should decide whether to now sign on for that very third year as the vast majority of my work ended on oct 15. you recently told me you thought i was kidding. .you hired brad patting him on the back that after months of inquiry he can now, finally tell you which Ilc owns the cars??

once he has all the facts what next ??. whether or not you refer to a portion of the third year as after care, or whatever term besides 'scoundrel you choose to use, I m not sure why you assume now it should be free.( I HATE THIS CONVERSATION < HATE , ) and i heard you when you said you told me what was I work still to be done you thought valuable enough to pay for. please tell me . and then we can decide the next steps „, if any. I consider my work rarefied art. I guess the value is in the eye of the beholder . IT reminds me of those people looking at a modern art piece and saying " my child could do that " . hope you are feeling better.

📅 Aug 18, 2017 FROM EPSTEIN

Alert - harvard

From: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>

To: jeevacation@gmail.com

August 18, 2017 9:00 AM : harvard conversation-id 34422 date-last-viewed 0 date-received 1503063897 flags 8590195713 gmail-label-ids 7 6 2 remote-id 740340

August 18, 2017 9:00 AM : harvard conversation-id 34422 date-last-viewed 0 date-received 1503063897 flags 8590195713 gmail-label-ids 7 6 2 remote-id 740340

📅 May 1, 2015 FROM EPSTEIN

(no subject)

From: jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>

To: M=lanie Spinella

I know that both you =nd I heard brads'. im out of here if i dont get a coo. . s=rry,. i know that neither of us have stood in the way of his finding= gettting one.. JPM account DB account GS account, ??? i=s MAY 1. nothing in the first quarter and these are only papers that=need signing. I suggest your thinking on my role and compen=ation for my work might benefit , from a mental shift - think =ark and josh, without the mutual resentment ( HAHA) only in terms of=sharing ,thanks, I am and have

I know that both you =nd I heard brads'. im out of here if i dont get a coo. . s=rry,. i know that neither of us have stood in the way of his finding= gettting one.. JPM account DB account GS account, ??? i=s MAY 1. nothing in the first quarter and these are only papers that=need signing.

I suggest your thinking on my role and compen=ation for my work might benefit , from a mental shift - think =ark and josh, without the mutual resentment ( HAHA) only in terms of=sharing ,thanks, I am and have been your financial part=er i.. rectifying circumstances that appear in hind sight =AO unexplainable. I wish you woudl have asked me earllier to =eview your things , but i understand. I do know that soley as=a result of my actions your personal bottom line has =AO increased dramatically, if you had thought of me as your p=rtner in this endeavor , instead of an employee, i think your reacti=n to sharing t benefits would be different.

If you=C2 recall, you wanted me to be paid , unlike others at the =ND of my work. we discussed this ad nauseum, and agreed OCT 15= last year was the end . You had wanted more comfort ini=ially on the art partnership so that date was delayed. It has =ow been six monhts since then, your concept of aftercare=. . for free. was already unique , in your words this h=s to have an end.( weaned ) if the actions of josh and =ark led to one hundred million dollars , what would be their s=are. Im not sure why it is different in your mind. but = respect the fact that it is, Is it because their work seems harder.=C2 it cannot be simply because they devote more time =o you .or it appears to involve more effort. I am happy to con=inue to play a partnership role. as I have been in many areas =f your life.. I am also happy to move on and have no more of these =mails. I find them as tedious as you do . if you prefer a part=ership structure , ok with me, I tried to minimize the amount of money i wruld recieve by making it a flat fee . as i wanted you to feel good a=d have no second thoguths somehow if the payment comes from a=partnership structure you seem relaxed as opposed to writing a check, =AO I focus on trust and friendship first, and the fact t=at you don't include josh and mark in that category, gives me gr=at pause . I proposed 33 percent of money made for you. . =AO in the past you agreed that amount. it will be huge, but o= with me, I can talk today at 945 as you suggested. or i= you woudl rather over the weekend ok

p=ease note

EFTA_R1_01872004
EFTA02639566

The information contained in this communication is co=fidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside inf=rmation, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the p=operty of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this com=unication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawfu=. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us im=ediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com <mailto:jeevacation=gmail.com> , and destroy thi= communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyr=ght -all rights reserved

=AO please note

The information contained in this commu=ication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may cons=itute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addre=see. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copyi=g of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited a=d may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, pl=ase notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, a=d destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all a=tachments. copyright -all rights reserved

📅 Aug 19, 2017 FROM EPSTEIN

Fwd:

From: jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>

To: Jeffrey Epstein

Forwarded messag= From: jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.co= <mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com» Date: Fri, May 1, 2015 at 8:36 AM Subject: To: M=lanie Spinella I know that both you =nd I heard brads'. im out of here if i dont get a coo. . s=rry,. i know that neither of us have stood in the way of his finding= gettting one.. JPM account DB account GS account, ??? i=s MAY 1. nothing in the first quarter and these are only papers that=need signing. I suggest your thinking on my role and compen=ation f

Forwarded messag=

From: jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.co= <mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com»
Date: Fri, May 1, 2015 at 8:36 AM
Subject:

To: M=lanie Spinella

I know that both you =nd I heard brads'. im out of here if i dont get a coo. . s=rry,. i know that neither of us have stood in the way of his finding= gettting one.. JPM account DB account GS account, ??? i=s MAY 1. nothing in the first quarter and these are only papers that=need signing.

I suggest your thinking on my role and compen=ation for my work might benefit , from a mental shift - think =ark and josh, without the mutual resentment ( HAHA) only in terms of=sharing ,thanks, I am and have been your financial part=er i.. rectifying circumstances that appear in hind sight =AO unexplainable. I wish you woudl have asked me earllier to =eview your things , but i understand. I do know that soley as=a result of my actions your personal bottom line has =AO increased dramatically, if you had thought of me as your p=rtner in this endeavor , instead of an employee, i think your reacti=n to sharing t benefits would be different.

If you=C2 recall, you wanted me to be paid , unlike others at the =ND of my work. we discussed this ad nauseum, and agreed OCT 15= last year was the end . You had wanted more comfort ini=ially on the art partnership so that date was delayed. It has =ow been six monhts since then, your concept of aftercare=. . for free. was already unique , in your words this h=s to have an end.( weaned ) if the actions of josh and =ark led to one hundred million dollars , what would be their s=are. Im not sure why it is different in your mind. but = respect the fact that it is, Is it because their work seems harder.=C2 it cannot be simply because they devote more time =o you .or it appears to involve more effort. I am happy to con=inue to play a partnership role. as I have been in many areas =f your life.. I am also happy to move on and have no more of these =mails. I find them as tedious as you do . if you prefer a part=ership structure , ok with me, I tried to minimize the amount of money i wruld recieve by making it a flat fee . as i wanted you to feel good a=d have no second thoguths somehow if the payment comes from a=partnership structure you seem relaxed as opposed to writing a check, =AO I focus on trust and friendship first, and the fact t=at you don't include josh and mark in that category, gives me gr=at pause . I proposed 33 percent of money made for you. . =AO in the past you agreed that amount. it will be huge, but o= with me, I can talk today at 945 as you suggested. or i= you woudl rather over the weekend ok

p=ease note

EFTA_R1_01872004
EFTA02639566

The information contained in this communication is co=fidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside inf=rmation, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the p=operty of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this com=unication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawfu=. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us im=ediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com <mailto:jeevacation=gmail.com> , and destroy thi= communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyr=ght -all rights reserved

=AO please note

The information contained in this commu=ication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may cons=itute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addre=see. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copyi=g of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited a=d may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, pl=ase notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, a=d destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all a=tachments. copyright -all rights reserved

--94eb2c1150a6a9f02d0557102fc9-- conversation-id 117073 date-last-viewed 0 date-received 1503101914 flags 8590195713 gmail-label-ids 7 6 2 remote-id 740486

2

EFTA_R1_01872005
EFTA02639567

📅 May 11, 2015 REDACTED

(no subject)

From: █████████

To: █████████

📅 Aug 19, 2017 REDACTED

Fwd:

From: personal Gmail address <█████████>

To: █████████

lets look at funding the art =artnership begin with 100 m of unencumbered art. plus 20 invee=tment. and the same amoiunt of value from trust. =C2 leon should choose b trustee and begin to use mechanics. =C2 . later we can amend and add . 2 hire an 1= person asap 3.1 would hire jerry the woman. gitt=s. person 4.1 will find a subpart k person to handle p=rtnership acct 5, accounting software upgrade, aniline banki=g needs to be seamless 6. not sure status of brin=ing plane boat acct inhouse?

lets look at funding the art =artnership begin with 100 m of unencumbered art. plus 20 invee=tment. and the same amoiunt of value from trust. =C2 leon should choose b trustee and begin to use mechanics. =C2 . later we can amend and add .

2 hire an 1= person asap

3.1 would hire jerry the woman. gitt=s. person

4.1 will find a subpart k person to handle p=rtnership acct

5, accounting software upgrade, aniline banki=g needs to be seamless

6. not sure status of brin=ing plane boat acct inhouse?

7 prepare fbar rep=rt for june. draft next week

8 pahidon actuals vs proje=tions. . new valuation

9. new valuation of tra c=ntract?

jpm db goldman sachs acct? new Ilc?=

review of dec 31books for all entities? b=p . etc

plea=e note

The information contained in this communication is confi=ential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside inform=tion, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the prop=rty of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this commun=cation or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. =f you have received this communication in error, please notify us immed=ately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com <mailtcrjeevacation@gm=il.com> , and destroy this c=mmunication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyrigh= -all rights reserved

=AO please note

The information contained in this commu=ication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may cons=itute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addre=see. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copyi=g of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited a=d may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, plrase notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, a=d destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all a=tachments. copyright -all rights reserved

📅 Dec 28, 2014 FROM EPSTEIN

jobs ahead

From: jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>

To: Brad Wechsler, Melanie Spinella, Ada Capp

1. review accounting system. Book keeping software. staff, (senior accountant) methods on line banking, brokerage. cash mgmt. airplane reimbursement. boat sale. art purchases sales use and sales tax. tax filing FBAR FATCA, gaming commission, pfics, insurance. uk co law. 2. review docs for TRA BRH grats, trusts, heritage will, insurance, art lending. medical, springing powers. two fire drill books. one needed for injury. other for death 3. review bills. boats, planes, legal, (PW, McFarlands AO

1. review accounting system. Book keeping software. staff, (senior accountant) methods on line banking, brokerage. cash mgmt. airplane reimbursement. boat sale. art purchases sales use and sales tax. tax filing FBAR FATCA, gaming commission, pfics, insurance. uk co law.

2. review docs for TRA BRH grats, trusts, heritage will, insurance, art lending. medical, springing powers. two fire drill books. one needed for injury. other for death

3. review bills. boats, planes, legal, (PW, McFarlands AO all outside. legal and accounting. Toms bills over 40k. house projects. south ny ben

4. cashflow projections tax projections, interaction with Apollo accounting tax, Phaidon, art space, and Regan. legal accounting. audit

5. children meetings, review to date and allocations

6. review all role in payables. files scanned, no paper

7. review investments for tax basis and unrecognized gain

8. schedule of all hedge funds. redeemables commitments AO etc.

9. charities pledges structure, staff,

📅 May 13, 2015 FROM EPSTEIN

Fwd: job ahead

From: jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>

To: Melanie Spinella

the list that we discussed.. i spent time with brad again. re the candidates. filing due, this week, next month.

the list that we discussed.. i spent time with brad again. re the candidates. filing due, this week, next month.

📅 Aug 19, 2017 FROM EPSTEIN

Fwd: jobs ahead

From: jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>

To: Jeffrey Epstein

Forwarded message From: jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> Date: Wed, May 13, 2015 at 9:04 AM Subject: Fwd: job ahead To: Melanie Spinella the list that we discussed.. i spent time with brad again. re the candidates. filing due, this week, next month.

Forwarded message

From: jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, May 13, 2015 at 9:04 AM
Subject: Fwd: job ahead
To: Melanie Spinella

the list that we discussed.. i spent time with brad again. re the candidates. filing due, this week, next month.

📅 Aug 17, 2017 REDACTED

Next

From: Chris Lawler

Hi Richard — we are on=the line for our scheduled call. Let us know if this time still work=. Thanks

Hi Richard — we are on=the line for our scheduled call. Let us know if this time still work=. Thanks

📅 Aug 17, 2017 REDACTED

Re: Next

From: Richard Kah

shall i join or wait for you p=ease advise thank you Richard Kahn HBRK Associates Inc.

shall i join or wait for you
p=ease advise
thank you

Richard Kahn

HBRK Associates Inc.

📅 Aug 17, 2017 FROM EPSTEIN

Re: Next

From: jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>

To: Richard Kahn

im free now

im free now

📅 May 18, 2015 FROM EPSTEIN

agenda for tomorrow

From: jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>

To: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>, Melanie Spinella

as a reflection on your voiced spirited concerns in the what have you done for me lately category? )):: in the beginning, there was eileen and tom. (eve and adam,-- however it appears, she declined to eat the apple from the knowledge tree) that was it. ada was at the bank but reviewing docs. carlyn was in the kitchen making mush (abel and cain) books as they were mysteriously called was being kept solely by eileen, with little or no input, correction or advice from tom. he rarely if ever asked

as a reflection on your voiced spirited concerns in the what have you done for me lately category? ))::

in the beginning, there was eileen and tom. (eve and adam,-- however it appears, she declined to eat the apple from the knowledge tree)

that was it. ada was at the bank but reviewing docs. carlyn was in the kitchen making mush (abel and cain) books as they were mysteriously called was being kept solely by eileen, with little or no input, correction or advice from tom. he rarely if ever asked questions. expenses ie airplane was done in house apollo. (1031 exchange blown etc) at this time

as I recall you got quite annoyed, and aggressive and initiated the "talking out of the both sides of your mouth" tiddy, when i suggested that the level of their competence left much to be desired. (ralph lerner's came later) response - eileen ran the desk, tom is a partner, ralph wrote the book etc

re tax there was almost no oversight of income, estate, gift, sales and use, transfer excise etc. IRS SEC GAMING NYS. real estate, valuations (many tax filings- disclosures, etc. re grats trusts defect trusts, llics corps, trustees, partnerships. foreign corps. 100 bank accounts. gift taxes, loans, notes. payables. expenses. insurance.(life, art, split dollar), cashflows, operating biz, investments, contingent liabilities.(funds, miami), commitments dividends, BRH TRA, shareholder agreements, bank loan agreements. wills, construction, contracts planning permits etc..employ rules. checking account reconciliations, credit cards. jewelry, cost basis, (art stock etc.) foundations regs, brokerage accts, old stock certificates. stock options,(environmental solutions still not done!). estate tax calculation firedrill, (note, basis etc) low basis, step ups, however with no accounting system, no review of boat expenses plan expenses etc. many outside counsel with little or no coordination. Paul Weisss, Mcdermit Will, Macfarlanes. Price Waterhouse, Reich, withers bergman, Empire, akin gump, bbd seidman, Wendy, apollo in house.

lumber, knowledge universe, environmental, solutions 12 mil in stock, on and on

the priority list that you asked me to prepare for brad and you in dec, unfortunately so far, little change ie no accounting system that ties, no, brokerage accounts though strongly suggested, jpm db, gs, april of 2014. IT antiquated

dagastino hired, no input from me, julie, temps, paralegals miriam. etc.

still need new accounting system - on line banking. staff hires. (separate from samantha two years out of school). audit system, ?? john murphy? joslin? dag? eva? i strongly suggest workers at the highest level of competence. two senior accountants. not managers workers who will get into the weeds. partn expertise, replace ava, get heather help. a new person legal, new IT, system and person, way way overdue, new receptionist, bill opener, ability to oversee in house, boat plane review household (12 million) review, filings- partnership accounting,- familiarity with grats, trusts etc. audit system put in place. that should be the easy part. then strategy to deal with: As new facts on the ground develop, phaidon debra, children meetings, stock sale sale of art, apt(large gain), 1031 trade in, plane depreciation, boat sale. construction, brad will oversee brokerage and investment, pe. real es, publishing, grats, tra, brh (death). foundation, museum, tax projections cash flow projections, coordination with tax from apollo. etc

please note

The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

📅 Aug 19, 2017 FROM EPSTEIN

Fwd: agenda for tomorrrow

From: jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>

To: Jeffrey Epstein

Forwarded messag= From: jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.co= <mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com» Date: Mon, May 18, 2015 at 8:17 AM Subject: agenda f=r tomorrrow To: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com <mailto:jeevacation@gmail=com», Melanie Spinella as a reflection on your voiced spirited co=cerns in the what have you done for me lately category ? )):: =C2 . in the beginning =AO. there was eileen and tom. ( eve and adam,-- however it app=ars, she declined to eat the apple from the knowledge tree)

Forwarded messag= From: jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.co= <mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com» Date: Mon, May 18, 2015 at 8:17 AM Subject: agenda f=r tomorrrow To: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com <mailto:jeevacation@gmail=com», Melanie Spinella

as a reflection on your voiced spirited co=cerns in the what have you done for me lately category ? )):: =C2 .

in the beginning =AO. there was eileen and tom. ( eve and adam,-- however it app=ars, she declined to eat the apple from the knowledge tree) </=iv>

. that was it. ada was at the bank but reviewin= docs. carlyn was in the kitchen making mush ( abel and cain)<=div> books as they were mystersiously called was being kep= soley by eileen, with little or no input ,correction or advice from=tom. herarely if ever asked questions. expenses ie =AO airplane was done in house apollo. (1031exchange blown etc) =A0at this time

as I recall you got quite annoyed, =nd agressive and initiated the" talking out of the both sides o= your mouth " tiddy, when i suggested that the level of their c=mpetence left much to be desired. ( ralph lerner's came later ) =C2 .response - eileen ran the desk, torn is a partner, ralph =rote the book etc

re tax there was almost no oversi=ht of income, estate, gift ,sales and use, transfer excise etc =A0. IRS SEC GAMING NYS. real estate, valuations ( many =tax filings- disclosures, etc. re grats trusts d=fect trusts, llics corps , trustees , partnerships. foreign corps. =C2 100 bank accounts. gift taxes, , loans, notes. payables. expen=es. . , insurance.( life , art, split dollar), cashflows, oper=ting biz, , investments, contingent liabilities.( funds , miami ) , comm=tmnts dividends, BRH TRA, shareholder agreements, bank =oan agreements. wills, construction, , contracts planni=g permits etc..employ rules. checking account reconciliations,= crediti cards. jewelry , cost basis ,( art stock etc.) =C2 foundations regs , brokerage accts, old stock certificates. =A0 stock options,( environmental solutions still not done !). estate tax c=lcuatlon firedrill, ( note ,basis etc ) low basis , step ups , howe=er with no accounting system, no reveiw of boat expenses plan= expenses etc. . many outside counsel with litle or no coordination.=/div> Paul Weisss , Mcdermit Will, Macfarlanes. Price Waterhouse=, Reich, withers bergman, Empire, , akin gump, bbd seidman, Wendy , =pollo in house .

lumber, knowledge universe, ennv=ronmental, solutions 12 mii in stock, . on and on

the priority list that you asked me to prepare =or brad and you in dec , unfortunatlleyso far , li=tle change ie no accounting system that ties, no, brokerage ac=ounts though strongly suggested , jpm db, gs, april of 2=14 . IT antiquated

dagastino hired , no inut from m=, julie, temps, paralegals miriam . etc.

=div>still need new accounting system - on line banking . =AOstaff hires. ( seprate from samantha two years out of school ). =C2 audit system, . ?? john murphy? joslin? dag? eva? . i str=ngly suggest workers at the highest level of

1

EFTA_R1_01872015
EFTA02639574

competence. two s=nior accountants. not managers workers who will get into the weeds. =C2 partn expertise„ replace ava, get heather help. a new person=legal , new IT,system and person, way way overdue, new recept=onist, bill opener, ability to oeversee in house, boat pla=e review household ( 12million ) review, filings- partnerhip account=ng,- familitarity with grats, trusts etc . audit system put in place. that=should be the easy part. then strategy to deal with : ./cliv> As new facts on the ground develop , phaidon debra,=children meeetings, ? stock sale sale of art, apt( large gai= ), 1031 trade in , plane depreciation, boat sale. construction , br=d will oversee brokerage and investment, ?? pe. real es, . publishin=, grats, tra, brh ( death). foundation , museum, tax proejctio=s cash flow projections, cooridnation with tax from apollo. etc

<=iv>

=C2 please note

The information contained in this communic=tion is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constit=te inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addresse=. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying =f this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and =ay be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, pleas= notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and<=r>destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all atta=hments. copyright -all rights reserved

=AO please note

The information contained in this commu=ication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may cons=itute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addre=see. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copyi=g of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited a=d may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, pl=ase notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, a=d destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all a=tachments. copyright -all rights reserved

--94eb2c064e28f149170557103b56-- conversation-id 115779 date-last-viewed 0 date-received 1503102120 flags 8590195713 gmail-label-ids 7 6 2 remote-id 740489

2

EFTA_R1_01872016
EFTA02639575

📅 Aug 17, 2017 FROM EPSTEIN

(no subject)

From: jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>

To: Anastasiya Siro

nice seeing you. can you send me david weiss n=mber and tell him i will call , and he can share everytning with me

nice seeing you. can you send me david weiss n=mber and tell him i will call , and he can share everytning with me

📅 Aug 18, 2017

is traffic-could be a tad late

From: Lesley Groff

To: Jeffrey Epstein

is in traffic...she says she could be a tad late...

is in traffic...she says she could be a tad late...

📅 Aug 18, 2017

(no subject)

From: David Stern

To: Jeffrey Epstein

Edward will receive an offer to do his shadowing at Bank of China. He doesn't know yet but it has been confirmed to me. He will be contacted shortly. Love from Hong Kong

Edward will receive an offer to do his shadowing at Bank of China.

He doesn't know yet but it has been confirmed to me. He will be contacted shortly.

Love from Hong Kong